[Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5892 (3312)

[John C Klensin]

--On Thursday, August 09, 2012 10:32 -0400 Barry Leiba
<barryleiba at computer.org> wrote:

>>> For the rule to be evaluated to True for the label, it MUST
>>> be evaluated to True for every occurrence of Code point in
>>> the label.
>> 
>> I have got a suggestion to instead of the above have this
>> text:
>> 
>>         For the rule to be evaluated to True for the label, it
>>         MUST be evaluated separately for every occurrence of
>>         the Code point in the label; each of those
>>         evaluations must result in TRUE.
> 
> I like this change; I think it makes it clearer.  I'll edit the
> erratum before I mark it Verified.

Barry, please note that I completely screwed up the case of
"true" and "must" in my suggestion.  Please including getting it
right in your edit.

   john