confusing notation in the ZERO WIDTH NON-JOINER contextual rule
Patrik Fältström
paf at frobbit.se
Thu Aug 9 11:09:20 CEST 2012
Sorry, detected an error that I corrected before I submitted the errate:
9 aug 2012 kl. 11:06 skrev Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se>:
> OLD:
>
> In A:
>
> Code point:
>
> The code point, or code points, to which this rule is to be
> applied. Normally, this implies that if any of the code points in
> a label is as defined, then the rules should be applied. If
> evaluated to True, the code point is OK as used; if evaluated to
> False, it is not OK.
>
> In A.1:
>
> Rule Set:
> False;
> If Canonical_Combining_Class(Before(cp)) .eq. Virama Then True;
> If RegExpMatch((Joining_Type:{L,D})(Joining_Type:T)*\u200C
> (Joining_Type:T)*(Joining_Type:{R,D})) Then True;
>
> NEW:
>
> In A:
>
> Code point:
>
> The code point, or code points, to which this rule is to be
> applied. Normally, this implies that if any of the code points in
> a label is as defined, then the rules should be applied. If
> evaluated to True, the code point is OK as used; if evaluated to
> False, it is not OK.
>
> For the rule to be evaluated to True for the label, it MUST be
> evaluated to True for every occurrence of Code point in the
> label.
>
> In A.1:
>
> Rule Set:
> False;
> If Canonical_Combining_Class(Before(cp)) .eq. Virama Then True;
> If cp .eq. \u200C .and. RegExpMatch((Joining_Type:{L,D})(Joining_Type:T)*cp
This line should be:
If cp .eq. \u200C And RegExpMatch((Joining_Type:{L,D})(Joining_Type:T)*cp
> (Joining_Type:T)*(Joining_Type:{R,D})) Then True;
Patrik
More information about the Idna-update
mailing list