phoffman at imc.org
Sun Mar 20 15:59:49 CET 2011
On Mar 20, 2011, at 7:30 AM, Vint Cerf wrote:
> i think patrik correctly interprets the rule as always reading "for
> each character"
> but your way of stating it makes that perhaps more explicit.
The "For All Characters:" construct is defined at the bottom of page 14 of RFC 5892, and is used in a few of the definitions. I am not sure it applies here, however, thus my question.
More information about the Idna-update