I-D Action:draft-faltstrom-5892bis-02.txt

[Patrik Fältström]

Thanks Mark.

   Patrik

On 18 feb 2011, at 18.43, Mark Davis ☕ wrote:

> That would work fine for me, with a slight change to wording.
> 
>> Mark Davis also contributed to the document, but do not believe the
>> description of the issues in this document is optimal.
> 
> =>
> 
>> Mark Davis also contributed to the document, but does not believe the
>> solution for the issues discussed in this document is optimal.
> 
> - from phone
> On Feb 18, 2011 4:38 AM, "Patrik Fältström" <patrik at frobbit.se> wrote:
>> 
>> On 31 jan 2011, at 19.14, Mark Davis ☕ wrote:
>> 
>>> 5. Acknowledgements
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The main contributors are (in alphabetical order) Eric Brunner-
>>> Williams, Vint Cerf, Tina Dam, Mark Davis, Matin Duerst, John
>>> Klensin, Pete Resnick, Markus Scherer, Andrew Sullivan, Kenneth
>>> Whistler and Nicholas Williams.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> While I appreciate being as a contributor, I don't believe that the
> described consensus is optimal. So it is probably best to remove my name.
>> 
>> Sorry for this taken so long time, but I have been discussing this issue
> with representatives of the IETF trust. It was a new "case" for them, and
> the way the mechanisms work, the intention with the RFCs is to name everyone
> that have contributed to the document. Regardless of whether they are part
> of the rough, or non-rough part of the rough consensus.
>> 
>> So, I have problems completely removing your name as you have added so
> much information to the discussion, but, I am happy to clarify in this
> section exactly what you write above.
>> 
>> My suggestion is because of this to have this section instead of the above
> be the following (with a correction of spelling of Martin's name):
>> 
>> 5. Acknowledgements
>> 
>> 
>> The main contributors are (in alphabetical order) Eric Brunner-
>> Williams, Vint Cerf, Tina Dam, Martin Duerst, John
>> Klensin, Pete Resnick, Markus Scherer, Andrew Sullivan, Kenneth
>> Whistler and Nicholas Williams.
>> 
>> Mark Davis also contributed to the document, but do not believe the
>> description of the issues in this document is optimal.
>> 
>> 
>> Is that ok with people? Specifically you Mark.
>> 
>> Patrik
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Idna-update mailing list
>> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
>> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update