RFC5895 and UTS46 ?

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Tue Oct 26 01:39:20 CEST 2010

On 10/25/10 5:26 PM, =JeffH wrote:
> Are RFC5895 and UTS46 mutually-exclusive? I.e. one should adhere to one
> or the other, but not "mix" the two? Or the converse?

First of all, neither of these is officially part of IDNA.

However, as I understand it, they are two ways of doing the same thing,
so use one or the other but not both.


Peter Saint-Andre

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6105 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update/attachments/20101025/50a49ca5/attachment.bin>

More information about the Idna-update mailing list