Unicode 5.2 -> 6.0

Patrik Fältström patrik at frobbit.se
Sat Oct 16 09:40:27 CEST 2010

On 15 okt 2010, at 18.37, Mark Davis ☕ wrote:

> There is already a table of *41* exceptions in
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5892#section-2.6:
> [\u302E\u302F \u0640 \u07FA \u30FB \u00B7 \u05F3 \u05F4 \u0F0B \u0375 \u303B
> \u3031-\u3035 \u0660\u06F0 \u0661\u06F1 \u0662\u06F2 \u0663\u06F3
> \u0664\u06F4 \u0665\u06F5 \u0666\u06F6 \u0667\u06F7 \u0668\u06F8
> \u0669\u06F9 \u00DF \u03C2 \u06FD \u06FE \u3007]


But the following two are not exceptions based on a character by character inspection, which is what we talk about here. 

The derived property value is based on meta data attached to the codepoint by Unicode Consortium.

> For that matter there are *2* exceptions in
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5892#section-2.4:
> [\u200C\u200D]
> And there are *357* exceptions in
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5892#section-2.8:
> [\u1100-\u115E \uA960-\uA97C \u115F-\u11A7 \uD7B0-\uD7C6 \u11A8-\u11FF
> \uD7CB-\uD7FB]


More information about the Idna-update mailing list