Unicode 5.2 -> 6.0
kenw at sybase.com
Fri Oct 15 02:20:59 CEST 2010
> I'm confused, is this page in error as to the codepoint:
> It says:
> A general category change to one New Tai Lue numeric character
> (U+19CA), which would have the effect of disqualifying it from
> inclusion in identifiers unless grandfathering measures are in
> place for the defining identifier syntax
> So, which is it, U+19CA or U+19DA?
U+19DA. There is a typo on the page *about* the standard,
as you have quoted, but the data files (and charts)
are correct. The typo will be fixed... I'm sorry that
it has introduced confusion into this discussion.
More information about the Idna-update