Unicode 5.2 -> 6.0

[Kenneth Whistler]

> I'm confused, is this page in error as to the codepoint:
> 
> http://unicode.org/versions/Unicode6.0.0/
> 
> ?
> 
> It says:
> 
>     A general category change to one New Tai Lue numeric character
>     (U+19CA), which would have the effect of disqualifying it from
>     inclusion in identifiers unless grandfathering measures are in
>     place for the defining identifier syntax 
> 
> So, which is it, U+19CA or U+19DA?

U+19DA. There is a typo on the page *about* the standard,
as you have quoted, but the data files (and charts)
are correct. The typo will be fixed... I'm sorry that
it has introduced confusion into this discussion.

--Ken