Unicode 5.2 -> 6.0

[Mark Davis ☕]

Sorry, I was looking at (C) in your original message, not (C) in Ken's
message (which is the same as my C2).

Mark

*— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —*


2010/10/14 Mark Davis ☕ <mark at macchiato.com>

> What you are saying isn't quite specific enough. There are multiple
> alternatives for C:
>
> C1 Add to clause G:
> U+0CF1 KANNADA SIGN JIHVAMULIYA => DISALLOWED
> U+0CF2 KANNADA SIGN UPADHMANIYA => DISALLOWED
>
> C2 Add to clause G
> U+19DA NEW TAI LUE THAM DIGIT ONE => PVALID
>
> C3 Do both C2 and C3.
>
>
> I think the correct course of action is C2.
>
> Mark
>
> *— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —*
>
>
> 2010/10/14 Patrik Fältström <patrik at frobbit.se>
>
>
>> On 14 okt 2010, at 23.31, Kenneth Whistler wrote:
>>
>> > Please see my long response just posted on this thread. This isn't
>> > a decision between A) or B). It is a decision between
>> > A) or B) or C), and I think C) is the correct answer.
>>
>> I have no problem being convinced I am wrong, and that (c) is the correct
>> answer.
>>
>> I did think carefully whether I should propose any solution at all, which
>> I did, which directly created a discussion, and counter proposal.
>>
>> We use "rough consensus" in the IETF, and given I now see rough consensus
>> is "alternative C", I will start creating an I-D reflecting exactly this.
>>
>>   Thanks Ken!
>>
>>      Patrik
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Idna-update mailing list
>> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
>> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update/attachments/20101014/427d69d1/attachment.html>