Mapping Poll - REQUEST
yoshiro.yoneya at jprs.co.jp
Tue Feb 9 05:45:40 CET 2010
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 03:56:44 -0500 Vint Cerf <vint at google.com> wrote:
> Please read and respond to the recent long message that ultimately
> asked for WG recommendations for moving forward on mapping.
> The Area Director is of the opinion that we do not have rough
> consensus on a way forward, so expressing your position is essential.
> The options are tersely listed below:
> 1. Would the WG like to adopt the current "mapping document" as-is?
> 2. Would the WG like to engage in further discussion about this
> document, for example in the context of the Unicode TR46 that
> advocates substantially more mapping than the present "mappings"
> 3. Would the WG propose an alternative path towards dealing with the
> question of mapping and if so, what proposition(s) are offered by the
> WG members?
Yoshiro YONEYA <yoshiri.yoneya at jprs.co.jp>
More information about the Idna-update