I-D Action:draft-faltstrom-5892bis-01.txt
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at shinkuro.com
Thu Dec 23 16:30:55 CET 2010
There seemed to be a lot of cc:s. I trimmed them.
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 03:41:44PM +0100, J-F C. Morfin wrote:
> Would this Draft be submitted to a sole IETF Last Call and not to a
> prior WG/IDNA2011 LC, I would obviously appeal it since it would only
> represent the consensus of a small group of people. This would be the
> same as if the new IUTF published a fundamental document without first
> liaising at least with ISO, ITU and IETF.
I think you have a deep confusion about IETF procedures. There is no
requirement that documents from the IETF automatically came from a
working group. An AD-sponsored document that goes through an IETF
last call can still represent IETF consensus. There is no IETF
requirement at all for a working group for this draft.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at shinkuro.com
Shinkuro, Inc.
More information about the Idna-update
mailing list