Comments on draft-ietf-idnabis-defs-10

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at
Tue Sep 1 23:06:10 CEST 2009

Hash: SHA1

On 9/1/09 2:54 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 04:50:40PM -0400, John C Klensin wrote:
>> I've patched the changes into Protocol, making modifications
>> only where conversion from A-labels to U-labels is discussed.
>> I'm going to post that version for WG review as soon as I can
>> get it compiled and submitted.  A version with the remaining
>> pre-IETF-last call patches (mainly the filling in of Section
>> numbers) will follow shortly (probably tomorrow) if either there
>> are no further comments or the comments indicate that this is
>> ok.
> This strategy is ok with me, but I want to state more clearly what I
> said before, and that is that once we have a complete document, in my
> opinion it would be very wise to have another short last call on the
> changed documents.  It's too bad we should have finally twigged to the
> significance of Wil's June comment at WGLC, but that's what LCs are
> for.  We shouldn't compound our error, however, by sending the
> document up without a second look.



- --
Peter Saint-Andre

Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -


More information about the Idna-update mailing list