vint at google.com
Tue Oct 20 04:01:31 CEST 2009
thanks for the update paul. I think your analysis on U+06D4 correctly
captures the less-than-consensus support for the proposition to
include in the mappings document.
On Oct 19, 2009, at 9:05 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> Based on the IETF Last Call comments, the only change we made was to
> correct the intended status to "Informational".
> Although there was a proposal to add U+06D4 to the list of full
> stops to be considered, there was some opposition and no additional
> support from the Arabic language community. It is possible (even
> likely) that later RFCs might suggest one or more full stops or
> other optional changes to this optional document, and there is
> nothing in the current document to discourage this.
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
More information about the Idna-update