[Idna-arabicscript] mapping of Full Stops

Andrew Sullivan ajs at shinkuro.com
Mon Oct 12 19:26:35 CEST 2009


On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 09:57:01AM -0700, Erik van der Poel wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 9:49 AM, "Martin J. Dürst"

> > Was U+06D4 allowed inside a label in IDNA 2003? If yes, then this will
> > indeed be a problem. If not, then the difference is only between being
> > resolved (with appropriate mapping in IDNA 2008) and not resolved (in IDNA
> > 2003), which is an unfortunate but tolerable difference in implementation
> > behavior.
> 
> U+06D4 is allowed inside a label in IDNA2003. Sorry, I should have
> been more explicit about that.

Ick.  Surely we can't be advocating that things are sometimes in-label
and sometimes not?

Do we have any evidence, positive or negative, about the use of U+06D4
intra-label?

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at shinkuro.com
Shinkuro, Inc.


More information about the Idna-update mailing list