[secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-idnabis-rationale-13.txt
hartmans-ietf at mit.edu
Tue Oct 6 16:03:50 CEST 2009
>>>>> "Vint" == Vint Cerf <vint at google.com> writes:
Vint> if we mention DNSSEC at all (and perhaps it is not necessary since
Vint> DNSSEC operates at the DNS level), we might simply say that IDNA is
Vint> compatible with DNSSEC since signed DNS entries that reference IDNA A-
Vint> labels are fully compatible with DNSSEC. It is a sort of gratuitous
Vint> statement but perhaps it was requested because DNSSEC was "new" and
Vint> the person requesting the reference wanted to be clear that IDNA
Vint> didn't invalid the use of DNSSEC?
I'd be happy with either no reference to dnssec or to the sort of
statement you propose above. I'd be happier with either than the
current text. However in the grand scheme of things this issue is not
a huge one.
More information about the Idna-update