[Idna-arabicscript] Call for votes for TATWEEL
jefsey at jefsey.com
Tue Mar 24 18:13:45 CET 2009
At 14:38 24/03/2009, Vint Cerf wrote:
>Since IETF works by rough consensus, I would have to say that, so
>far, the rough consensus is to disallow this character.
that the point is to decide:
- if this kind of linguistic decision belongs to the IETF's engineers.
- if yes, if deciding it, throught the jurisprudence of this case,
belongs to the WG-IDNABIS without revising the charter.
What is the point to have a consensus which will be denied by the IETF LC?
More information about the Idna-update