Question about the agenda

Vint Cerf vint at
Sat Mar 21 00:21:58 CET 2009


I am not sure I agree at least in the following sense. I think we need  
to ask ourselves, based on the goals of the WG and the current  
IDNA2008 documents, what our assessment is of its implementation, side- 
effects, etc. That is different from coming to conclusions among  
alternatives. Perhaps we are simply reflecting a different
interpretation of "conclusions"?


Vint Cerf
1818 Library Street, Suite 400
Reston, VA 20190
vint at

On Mar 20, 2009, at 6:38 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:

> Vint recently posted the agenda for next week's meetings to < 
> >. We cannot "complete discussions, if necessary on IDNA2008  
> implications" before the presentation on CJK implications of  
> IDNA2008. It would be good to change the schedule so that the  
> important considerations brought up by the Asian registries can be  
> considered before the implications are considered.
> _______________________________________________
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at

More information about the Idna-update mailing list