Eszett and IDNAv2 vs IDNA2008
ck at nic.museum
Sun Mar 15 19:53:33 CET 2009
>>How on earth did IDNA2008 become a matter of providing support for
>>this handful of code points?
> Note the subject line of this thread.
That doesn't really answer my question. Rather than rephrase it,
perhaps you'll allow me to ask another one. Noting that I am far less
familiar with IETF procedure than are most of the w.g. members, and
may therefore cause unintentional irritation for which I'll ask to be
forgiven up front --
The subject line of this thread implies that an individual member of a
working group can unilaterally draft a replacement to the documentation
that provided the basis for the w.g. charter, and expect that
alternative to be given equal consideration by the w.g.
Is that the way things work?
More information about the Idna-update