Fixing display variations (was: AW: Eszett and IDNAv2 vs IDNA2008)
John C Klensin
klensin at jck.com
Fri Mar 13 23:14:06 CET 2009
--On Friday, March 13, 2009 14:26 -0400 Andrew Sullivan
<ajs at shinkuro.com> wrote:
> So, if someone were to put together a document outlining what
> any presentation layer needs in terms of information about
> network names, that would probably be interesting input. It
> would not, however, be input for this WG working on the
> current problem it's aiming to solve, which is
> internationalization of the DNS and _not_ presentation
> problems of netnames.
I think this is another one of the WG's sources of disconnects.
Many of us believe that a presentation layer is important to
Internet i18n. Opinions differ as to how many of those there
should be. But it is fairly clear to most of us who believe in
such things that the DNS is below it somewhere, largely because
of intersections with the mapping-versus-matching, information
preservation, and display issues that keep distracting us
here... and that presentation-layer naming is not DNS naming.
More information about the Idna-update