Data on confusables

[Vint Cerf]

I took your remarks and Mark's to mean you wanted to re-open the  
substance of the mapping document.

v

On Jul 30, 2009, at 7:19 AM, Gervase Markham wrote:

> On 30/07/09 12:06, Vint Cerf wrote:
>> The WG went around on this topic several times and reached a
>> conclusion that differs from Mark's. At this point, I don't  
>> understand
>> the rationale for re-opening the debate.
>
> Mark said that he didn't think IDNA2008 would help with problem X. I  
> said that I thought it would. How is this "reopening a debate"? I  
> suppose it would be a fair criticism to say that our personal  
> speculations are unneeded on the list. But I don't see either of us  
> asking for any documents to be changed.
>
> Gerv