Potentially redundant context rules
Chris Wright
chris at ausregistry.com.au
Wed Jul 29 12:31:39 CEST 2009
Just to be clear, we were NOT stating that ALL of BIDI was covered by context rules, just that the digit mixing component was being covered twice.
Thanks
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: Matitiahu Allouche [mailto:matial at il.ibm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 29 July 2009 8:01 PM
To: Patrik Fältström
Cc: Chris Wright; idna-update at alvestrand.no work
Subject: Re: Potentially redundant context rules
Patrik Fältström asks if there is redundancy between the Bidi rules in
http://stupid.domain.name/ietf/draft-ietf-idnabis-bidi-03.txt and the
Bidi-related stuff in
http://stupid.domain.name/stuff/draft-ietf-idnabis-tables-06c.txt
My answer: there is some overlapping concerning not mixing different kinds
of digits in one label. The rest of the Bidi rules is absolutely not
covered in the Tables document.
Shalom (Regards), Mati
Bidi Architect
Globalization Center Of Competency - Bidirectional Scripts
IBM Israel
Phone: +972 2 5888802 Fax: +972 2 5870333 Mobile: +972 52
2554160
More information about the Idna-update
mailing list