mappings-01 and the general procedure

[Mark Davis ⌛]

I agree that that should be done, but John Klensin was against it. Something
about not being able to recognize separate labels (although current
technology does it just fine).

Mark


On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 06:37, Yoshiro YONEYA <yone at jprs.co.jp> wrote:

> I'm wondering if the general procedure is applied to FULL STOP characters.
> For example, Unicode string (FW- stands for Full Width)
>
>  U+FF41 U+FF58 U+FF41 U+FF4D U+FF50 U+FF4C U+FF45 U+FF0E U+FF43 U+FF6F
> U+FF6D
>  (FW-e) (FW-x) (FW-a) (FW-m) (FW-p) (FW-l) (FW-e) (FW-.) (FW-c) (FW-o)
> )FW-m)
>
> would be mapped into
>
>  example.com
>
> by the general procedure.  I think this behavior is a sort of label
> separator mapping.
>
> Then, I recommend to add following extra mapping just after Full/Half width
> mapping of the general procedure.
>
>  U+3002 (IDEOGRAPHIC FULL STOP) -> U+002E (FULL STOP)
>
> This is for compatibilty with IDNA2003 (Section 3.1, 1) of RFC3490).
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Yoshiro YONEYA <yone at jprs.co.jp>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update/attachments/20090726/047c820d/attachment.htm