IDNA Comparisons

Erik van der Poel erikv at google.com
Thu Jul 16 20:36:04 CEST 2009


ZWJ and ZWNJ (U+200C and U+200D) show that the IDNA2003 mapping is the
same as the IDNA2008 mapping, which is not true (in the current
IDNA2008 drafts).

Erik

On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Mark Davis ⌛<mark at macchiato.com> wrote:
> I put together a table that shows the assignments made by IDNA2008 and
> IDNA2003, respectively. I would urge people to review these for problems
> before Stockholm. For example, do we particularly want a hue and cry from
> the blind community because the rules exclude Braille?
>
> The file is at:
>
> http://macchiato.com/idna/idna-info.html
>
> There are plaintext versions in that directory also. The tab and html
> versions allow copy and paste into your favorite spreadsheet for comparison,
> so that you can filter and sort by different values.
>
> Key:
>
> codepoint or codepoint..codepoint (range)
> idna2008 status (REMAP if would be DISALLOWED, but has mapping)
> idna2008 mapping (if REMAP)
> idna2003 status (~ if same as idna2008)
> idna2003 mapping (~ if same as idna2008)
> general category (or general categories, if range)
> name or description (or range)
>
> There is one discrepancy that I need to track down, with LINEAR B SYLLABLE
> B008 A. Please let me know of any other problems
>
> Mark
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update
>
>


More information about the Idna-update mailing list