U+303B VERTICAL IDEOGRAPHIC ITERATION MARK

[Andrew Sullivan]

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 02:43:23PM +0200, Patrik Fältström wrote:

>> writing.  So it is rarely used in electrical writing for  
>> communication.
>> Thus, VERTICAL IDEOGRAPHIC ITERATION MARK should be DISALLOWED.
>
> Can I get a consensus on whether this should continue to be CONTEXTO or 
> DISALLOWED?
>
> It is today CONTEXTO.

I thought our general principle had been, "Not DISALLOWED unless
harmful."  This argument seems to be "DISALLOWED because not useful."
Therefore, CONTEXTO is correct, I'd say.

Sane registry policy everywhere will still probably set this to
registry-disallowed.

A
-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at shinkuro.com
Shinkuro, Inc.