U+07FA, NKO LAJANYALAN (was Re: consensus on TATWEEL)

Eric Brunner-Williams ebw at abenaki.wabanaki.net
Wed Jul 15 02:19:34 CEST 2009


I concur that the consensus on U+0640 ARABIC TATWEEL was (and probably 
still is) DISALLOWED.

Action Item: PAF.

Eric

Kenneth Whistler wrote:
> Michael said:
>
>   
>> There is one in Mongolian too.
>>     
>
> Michael is referring to U+180A MONGOLIAN NIRUGU, which
> is another of these stem extenders in a cursive script.
>
> However, unlike TATWEEL and NKO LAJANYALAN, U+180A
> is gc=Po (Punctuation, Other), in part because it also
> has another hyphen-like function in Mongolian. Because
> it is classed as punctuation, U+180A is already defined
> as DISALLOWED for IDNA in idnabis-tables-05.txt. So
> there is nothing further in question about U+180A.
>
> The issue is about explicitly disallowing U+0640 ARABIC TATWEEL
> and U+07FA NKO LAJANYALAN, which are gc=Lm, and which
> are still classed as PVALID in idnabis-tables-05.txt.
> (But which, when we discussed this last, we had consensus
> should be DISALLOWED, instead.)
>
> --Ken
>
>   
>> On 14 Jul 2009, at 22:58, Mark Davis ⌛ wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> This may have slipped through the cracks...
>>>
>>> Mark
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 01:35, Vint Cerf <vint at google.com> wrote:
>>> Not yet. I will post a call for consensus on that shortly. V
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Kent Karlsson
>>> To: Vint Cerf; idna-update at alvestrand.no
>>> Sent: Mon Apr 13 01:26:02 2009
>>> Subject: Re: consensus on TATWEEL
>>> I assume this also goes for U+07FA, NKO LAJANYALAN, which IIUC has  
>>> the same nature as TATWEEL.
>>>
>>>     /kent k
>>>       
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update
>
>
>   




More information about the Idna-update mailing list