U+07FA, NKO LAJANYALAN (was Re: consensus on TATWEEL)

[Mark Davis ⌛]

This may have slipped through the cracks...

Mark

On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 01:35, Vint Cerf <vint at google.com> wrote:

>  Not yet. I will post a call for consensus on that shortly. V
>
> ------------------------------
>  *From*: Kent Karlsson
> *To*: Vint Cerf; idna-update at alvestrand.no
> *Sent*: Mon Apr 13 01:26:02 2009
> *Subject*: Re: consensus on TATWEEL
> I assume this also goes for U+07FA, NKO LAJANYALAN, which IIUC has the same
> nature as TATWEEL.
>
>     /kent k
>
>
>
> Den 2009-04-13 06.38, skrev "Vint Cerf" <vint at google.com>:
>
> U+0640 ( ??? ) ARABIC TATWEEL (aka kashida)
>
> the overwhelming consensus on this character is to make it disallowed at
> protocol level.
>
> Patrik,
>
> can this be done without serious damage to the philosophy behind the
> construction of TABLES?
>
> vint
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update/attachments/20090714/376a7d6e/attachment.htm