mappings-01

[Vint Cerf]

first, major thanks for this new version of the mapping document.

second, do the two of you have a preference for how this mapping  
should be referenced?
Many participants have suggested that the mapping SHOULD be applied so  
as to convey
the importance of the regularity the document produces but allowing  
for circumstances that
might justify not mapping. I would underscore the weight given in IETF  
terms to "SHOULD"
as one is expected to adhere to the advice and only deviate for very  
good reasons.

vint



On Jul 3, 2009, at 5:52 PM, Pete Resnick wrote:

> New draft should appear momentarily.
>
> Vint and I roped in Paul to help with the draft. Paul and I decided
> to change a couple of things:
>
> 1. We got rid of the 2119 language. Paul convinced me it was  
> unnecessary.
> 2. We got rid of Appendix A. Again, he convinced me that the general
> algorithm (with specifics) should be sufficient.
>
> And we got in all of the specific references for the algorithm.
>
> Go forth and comment.
>
> pr
> -- 
> Pete Resnick <http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
> Qualcomm Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax:  
> (858)651-1102
> _______________________________________________
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update