AW: Sharp-S and Final Sigma Consensus Call Results

Vint Cerf vint at
Wed Dec 9 21:55:48 CET 2009

wouldn't mapping of pvalid chars would disrupt the A-Label/U-label  
If that isn't implicit in the protocol or at least rationale documents  
perhaps it should be?


On Dec 9, 2009, at 3:40 PM, Alexander Mayrhofer wrote:

>>> I am supporting PVALID for both Sharp-S and Final Sigma, given that
>>> mapping of PVALID characters is disallowed.
>> Mapping of PVALID characters is *not* disallowed in
>> draft-ietf-idnabis-mappings-05.
> I understand. An i don't think draft-ietf-idnabis-mappings should be  
> the
> place where mapping of PVALID characters should be disallowed - it's  
> an
> Informational document.
> The rule would need to be in one of the Standards Track documents.
> Alex

More information about the Idna-update mailing list