WG/IDNABIS LC

[Vint Cerf]

Elisabeth,

you are free to publish as an independent Internet Draft but not as a  
working group document.
The working group is near finalization of all documents currently  
produced under the current charter.
As Paul points out, we are about to forward the final documents to the  
Area Director with the request
to carry them forward as a set of RFCs.

During the IETF last call, assuming the IESG approves our final  
documents, you are free to make
reference to your I-D

vint


On Aug 29, 2009, at 7:49 PM, Elisabeth Blanconil wrote:

> Dear Vint,
>
> The IDNA is a key issue for the IUCG as a paradigm for the future of
> the Internet. This is why we invested much in it. There is therefore a
> need to make sure its description document set reflects a complete
> IETF and users consensus. To help this, we keep track of the
> WG-IDNABIS/LC requested and received answers. The IAB Draft on IDN has
> been added because some of some aspects which are important to the
> background and to the future of the Multilingual Internet.
>
> As you know we collectively carry this work in maintening an updated
> wiki page at http://wikidna.org/index.php?title=WG-IDNA_LC. We plan to
> publish it as an Internet Draft at the end of the Last Call, to (1)
> help the final smithing of its document set and (2) show the consensus
> (it will be introduced by JFC) over the achieved texts before the
> IETF/LC. Would it be better introduced as an independent submission or
> as a WG document?
>
> Best regards.
> Elisabeth Blanconil