Tamil Numerals in IDNA - Re: WG Last Call for Four Primary IDNABIS I-Ds

Nicolas Krebs nicolas1.krebs3 at netcourrier.com
Fri Aug 21 17:15:20 CEST 2009


Elisabeth Blanconil 

>Dear colleagues,
>
>This is a collective mail which discusses a strategic non-disclosed
>IUCG proposition in the multilinguistics area. It has been reveiwed by
>the IUCG Chair and will be published on the IUCG site.
>
>This is a new case of orthotypography based difficulty. The WG is in
>theory only interested by characters, translated in unicode points.
>However, in many cases natural languages are interfering or quoted in
>its Rationale. The WG must officially say how this is to be
>consistently addressed.
>
>For exemple, in the WG definitly not considered French case,
>upper-cases that support majuscules are DISALLOWED. This is absurd.

Can you list the issues?
Can you answer to http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update/2009-July/004696.html ?




More information about the Idna-update mailing list