comments on defs -- definition of "IDN"

John C Klensin klensin at
Sun Aug 9 23:31:48 CEST 2009

--On Sunday, August 09, 2009 5:10 PM -0400 Vint Cerf 
<vint at> wrote:

> I thought we had explicitly tried to separate out LDH from the
> other forms so that Andrew's formulation actually makes more
> sense.

ok, done.  Defs is now in the posting queue.  The two figures 
describe labels only, not FQDNs, so are not affected by this.


More information about the Idna-update mailing list