Tables and contextual rule for IDEOGRAPHIC ITERATION MARKs
kenw at sybase.com
Sat Apr 18 00:16:51 CEST 2009
I also agree completely with this conclusion.
BTW, Patrik, when are we likely to see an update
to the tables document that reflects the various
conclusions on these threads about context rules?
> This all makes sense. The information that äººäººãwould be
> orthographically wrong is one of the important bits I wanted to
> confirm. Based on your note and Yoneya-san's, I think we should
> get the iteration marks out of the CONTEXT category entirely,
> making the vertical ones DISALLOWED and the others that are in
> Lm PVALID.
> thanks to both you, Yoneya-san, and the others who have
> commented for your patience.
More information about the Idna-update