M-Label or MVALID, and dangers with mappings?

Patrik Fältström patrik at frobbit.se
Sat Apr 11 18:04:34 CEST 2009

On 11 apr 2009, at 17.53, Rémy Renardin wrote:

> I know I am French: I need some methodology. Sorry for that, but I  
> feel it
> helps. I feel A, M, U labels concepts should be put in a table in  
> regards of
> DN layers and the services performed at this layers.

Note that I am not talking about M-Labels. I am talking explicitly of  
property values of individual codepoints.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update/attachments/20090411/de03fe68/attachment.pgp 

More information about the Idna-update mailing list