M-label definition

Andrew Sullivan ajs at shinkuro.com
Mon Apr 6 14:51:27 CEST 2009


On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 11:17:16PM -0400, John C Klensin wrote:
> I think it would be a really bad (and very confusing) to end up
> with M-label(1) and M-label(2) even if different terms are used,
> so the WG will need to decide.

Agreed.  (2), please.  Proper subsets are easier to explain, in my
experience.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at shinkuro.com
Shinkuro, Inc.


More information about the Idna-update mailing list