Q1 is mapping on lookup permanent or transitional?
"Martin J. Dürst"
duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp
Wed Apr 1 09:09:30 CEST 2009
I would ideally like to see it as only transitional, but I don't think
we have a chance; as long as people get used to it, they will want
to keep it.
On 2009/04/01 1:05, Vint Cerf wrote:
> Q1: Should the proposed mapping on lookup in a revised IDNA2008
> protocol specification be a permanent feature of the protocol or
> should it have a finite lifetime? Should it be required or optional?
> This question is intended to be independent of the actual mapping that
> is done. If the question cannot be answered without having specific
> mapping in mind, we should recompose the question accordingly.
> Vint Cerf
> 1818 Library Street, Suite 400
> Reston, VA 20190
> vint at google.com
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
#-# Martin J.Dürst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp
More information about the Idna-update