Q1 is mapping on lookup permanent or transitional?

"Martin J. Dürst" duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp
Wed Apr 1 09:09:30 CEST 2009

I would ideally like to see it as only transitional, but I don't think
we have a chance; as long as people get used to it, they will want
to keep it.

Regards,     Martin.

On 2009/04/01 1:05, Vint Cerf wrote:
> Q1: Should the proposed mapping on lookup in a revised IDNA2008
> protocol specification be a permanent feature of the protocol or
> should it have a finite lifetime? Should it be required or optional?
> This question is intended to be independent of the actual mapping that
> is done. If the question cannot be answered without having specific
> mapping in mind, we should recompose the question accordingly.
> Vint Cerf
> Google
> 1818 Library Street, Suite 400
> Reston, VA 20190
> 202-370-5637
> vint at google.com
> _______________________________________________
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update

#-# Martin J.Dürst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp   mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp

More information about the Idna-update mailing list