Q1 is mapping on lookup permanent or transitional?
YAO Jiankang
yaojk at cnnic.cn
Wed Apr 1 04:28:19 CEST 2009
I think that it should be a permanent feature of the protocol to be compatible with IDNA2003.
YAO Jiankang
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vint Cerf" <vint at google.com>
To: <idna-update at alvestrand.no>
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 12:05 AM
Subject: Q1 is mapping on lookup permanent or transitional?
> Q1: Should the proposed mapping on lookup in a revised IDNA2008
> protocol specification be a permanent feature of the protocol or
> should it have a finite lifetime? Should it be required or optional?
>
> This question is intended to be independent of the actual mapping that
> is done. If the question cannot be answered without having specific
> mapping in mind, we should recompose the question accordingly.
>
>
>
> Vint Cerf
> Google
> 1818 Library Street, Suite 400
> Reston, VA 20190
> 202-370-5637
> vint at google.com
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update
More information about the Idna-update
mailing list