DNSSEC + IDN + INDccTLD

[JFC Morfin]

At 02:07 01/09/2008, Vint Cerf wrote:
>Edns0 does not require tcp as far as I know. V

http://www.caida.org/workshops/wide/0801/slides/castro-ditl_comparison.pdf
seems to indicate a proportional growth on non EDNS0.

It seems to mean that deploying IDN will call for an EDNS0 
promotion/installation campaign that will also support DNSSEC, while 
people supporting EDNS0 represent already a significant portion of 
already motivated users. Would it not be the best time to consider an 
EDNS1 version offering as well a simpler, clearer, cheaper and more 
robust innovative support of Unicode domain names and may be other features?
This is certainly a question that @large Internet lead users have and discuss.
jfc


>----- Original Message -----
>From: idna-update-bounces at alvestrand.no <idna-update-bounces at alvestrand.no>
>To: idna-update at alvestrand.no <idna-update at alvestrand.no>
>Sent: Sun Aug 31 16:23:01 2008
>Subject: DNSSEC + IDN + INDccTLD
>
>The talk of the town these days is DNSSEC. I worry about the size of
>an IDNccTLD + IDNs + DNSSEC responses, leading to a quite exclusive
>use of TCP. I wander if the related delay, security, documentation,
>operational aspects have been considered?
>jfc
>
>_______________________________________________
>Idna-update mailing list
>Idna-update at alvestrand.no
>http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update
>_______________________________________________
>Idna-update mailing list
>Idna-update at alvestrand.no
>http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update