DNSSEC + IDN + INDccTLD

Xiaodong Lee lee at cnnic.cn
Mon Sep 1 03:09:17 CEST 2008


If somebody does the test and give some analysis data will be better,  
to test what's the common size of DNSSEC+IDN+IDNccTLD.

--
-- Xiaodong LEE [The best answer is doing]
     +86-10-58813020
     mailto:lee at cnnic.cn
     http://lixiaodong.cn




在 2008-9-1,上午8:07, Vint Cerf 写道:

> Edns0 does not require tcp as far as I know. V
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: idna-update-bounces at alvestrand.no <idna-update-bounces at alvestrand.no 
> >
> To: idna-update at alvestrand.no <idna-update at alvestrand.no>
> Sent: Sun Aug 31 16:23:01 2008
> Subject: DNSSEC + IDN + INDccTLD
>
> The talk of the town these days is DNSSEC. I worry about the size of
> an IDNccTLD + IDNs + DNSSEC responses, leading to a quite exclusive
> use of TCP. I wander if the related delay, security, documentation,
> operational aspects have been considered?
> jfc
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update
> _______________________________________________
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update/attachments/20080901/0881df7d/attachment.htm 


More information about the Idna-update mailing list