KATS (Korean Agency for Technology and Standards)'s Comments on theUnicode Codepoints and IDNA Internet-Draft

[Patrik Fältström]

FWIW, as participant of this wg, I am now definitely convinced the wg  
should adopt the proposal from Korea.

As editor of the tables document, I am waiting for instructions from  
our wg chair on what he find the consensus is.

    Patrik

On 31 okt 2008, at 18.32, Dae Hyuk Ahn wrote:

> I have exactly same opinion with John and Michael.
>
> Thanks,
> Dae Hyuk Ahn. Ph.D.
>
>
> On 08. 10. 31 오후 11:26, "Michael  
> Everson" <everson at evertype.com> wrote:
>
> On 31 Oct 2008, at 14:06, John C Klensin wrote:
>
>> Finally, while we associated terms like "phishing" with our "leave
>> it to the registries" principle, I believe that the Korean case for
>> exclusion of Jamo has been clearly made and that we should not
>> attempt to fault (or punish) the rather considerable effort that has
>> been made here because they didn't understand the idiosyncrasies of
>> the vocabulary used in the WG.
>
> I also believe that a case for exclusion of Jamo has been clearly  
> made.
>
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update