KATS (Korean Agency for Technology and Standards)'s Comments on theUnicode Codepoints and IDNA Internet-Draft

[Michael Everson]

On 31 Oct 2008, at 14:06, John C Klensin wrote:

> Finally, while we associated terms like "phishing" with our "leave  
> it to the registries" principle, I believe that the Korean case for  
> exclusion of Jamo has been clearly made and that we should not  
> attempt to fault (or punish) the rather considerable effort that has  
> been made here because they didn't understand the idiosyncrasies of  
> the vocabulary used in the WG.

I also believe that a case for exclusion of Jamo has been clearly made.

Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com