Consensus Call Tranche 3 (Permanence)

[John C Klensin]

--On Sunday, 12 October, 2008 05:21 -0400 Vint Cerf
<vint at google.com> wrote:

> Consensus Call Tranche 3 (Permanence)
> 
> Place your reply here: [YES or NO]

Yes

> COMMENTS:

> (3) Permanence of DISALLOWED and PROTOCOL-VALID
> 
> (3.a) Once a character is classified as PROTOCOL-VALID, it
> will remain in that category for all future versions of the
> protocol and tables unless serious and unanticipated
> circumstances occur.  (R.10)
> 
> (3.b) Once a character is classified as DISALLOWED, it will
> remain in that category for all future versions of the protocol
> and tables unless serious and unanticipated circumstances
> occur.  Note that UNASSIGNED characters are not, for this
> purpose, DISALLOWED.  (R.5)