Consensus Call - Tranche 2 (Document Groupings)

[Simon Josefsson]

Vint Cerf <vint at google.com> writes:

> Consensus Call Tranche 2 (Document Groupings)
>
> Place your reply here: [YES or NO]

YES.

> COMMENTS:

I think 2.b and 2.c are easy to agree with.  For 2.a, contextual rules
may be useful to discuss in Protocol too, and to the point where it may
make sense to duplicate parts of the rules.  On the other hand, that
wouldn't be a big problem anyway.

/Simon

> (2) Document Groupings
>
>
> (2.a) The list of contextual rules and their values, including the
> associated IANA Considerations material, should be in Tables, not
> Rationale, Protocol, or elsewhere.  (R.8, P.1)
>
> (2.b) Protocol and Tables should not be combined, for reasons
> discussed extensively on the mailing list.
>
> (2.c) Protocol and Bidi should not be combined because the subject
> matter is rather different, as discussed extensively on the mailing
> list.
>
>
> NOTE NEW BUSINESS ADDRESS AND PHONE
> Vint Cerf
> Google
> 1818 Library Street, Suite 400
> Reston, VA 20190
> 202-370-5637
> vint at google.com
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update