Consensus Call Tranche 4/5 (Settled Textual Issues and IANA Considerations

[fujiwara at jprs.co.jp]

> From: Vint Cerf <vint at google.com>
> COMMENTS:

NO

> A YES response means that you agree with all of topics 4 and 5.
> 
> Procedure:
> (4) Textual issues believed settled
> 
> (4.a) The explanation of mappings in Rationale-02 and later is
> satisfactory.   (R.24)
> (4.f) The description of the implications of mapping changes
> between IDNA2003 and IDNA2008 is satisfactory in Rationale-02
> (R.28)

Rationale-03 Section 8 "Front-end and User Interface Processing" is
satisfactory, but the section should be moved to protocol document and

please recommend "General Preprocessing" for backword compatibility
with IDNA2003 (if implementors want compatilibity)
in protocol-05 Section 5.3.

> (4.b) The explanation of the symbol prohibition in Rationale-02
> and later is satisfactory.   (R.25)

Protocol-05 section 4.3.2.3 "Contextual Rules" are too complicated to
implement.

--
Kazunori Fujiwara, JPRS <fujiwara at jprs.co.jp>