Consensus Call Tranche 1 (Document Organization)

fujiwara at jprs.co.jp fujiwara at jprs.co.jp
Thu Oct 9 10:48:22 CEST 2008


> From: Vint Cerf <vint at google.com>
> DUE DATE: October 10, 2008 (ET)
> 
> Place your reply here: [YES or NO]

NO

COMMENTS:

I agree with the Rationale document necessity, but it should not
contain normative material and shuld be an informational document.

> - The normative material should be removed from Rationale and extracted to a separate document (for example Terms and Concepts) even if this lengthens the WG's target dates for an unknown period of time.  Note that there may be controversy about what material is normative and what is not; that is a separate consensus issue and may also take an unknown period of time to resolve   (R.2)

The normative material should be a separate document or merged to
protocol document.

--
Kazunori Fujiwara, JPRS <fujiwara at jprs.co.jp>


More information about the Idna-update mailing list