Suggestion for rearranging -BIDI

[Harald Alvestrand]

I have had a suggestion from one participant to reorder the material in 
-bidi.

He suggests placing the actual rules (section 4) first (after intro), 
followed by the rationale section, the requirements section and the 
caveats/issues sections.

The current layout (intro, rationale, requirements, rules, caveats) 
roughly reflects the thought stream that led to the document. It seemed 
rational to me at the time, but may not seem rational to a reader who 
comes at it out of the blue.

What do other readers think of this?

                    Harald