Follow-up to Monday's discussion of digits

[Andrew Sullivan]

On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 06:45:47AM -0600, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:

> Outside of the protocol, registries are free to implement a 
> registry-local policy, which may restrict code points in a label to one 
> range only, or one of two ranges, where one is in the U+0030..U+0039 
> range, but not both of the ranges U+0660..U+0669 and U+06F0..U+06F9.

Something that wasn't clear to me from the discussion yesterday is why
this ought not just to be a registry policy issue, in the way we have
said other possibly-confusing things ought to be.  Is the argument
from potential for harm?

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at shinkuro.com
Shinkuro, Inc.