Consensus Call Tranche 8 Results

[Jaap Akkerhuis]

    If there is no compelling analysis to support another approach,
    I would actually support changing the prefix.  There are some
    advantages in changing the prefix: it becomes clear which version
    of the IDNA specifications were used by the encoder.  That
    information is lost when the same prefix is used by both IDNA2003
    and IDNA2008.

That is not changing the prefix, it is adding one. That way one
creates another namespace with a big overlap to an existing one.
Aren't we confused enough already?

	jaap