is IDNA the ML-DNS we wait for ?

[Andrew Sullivan]

On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 10:50:12PM -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> > 6- why was the IDNA option chosen as the best way to support ML-DNS vs. 
> > other possibilities?
> 
> I think this is part of what John's current draft is about.

Apologies, I should have been more precise (especially in John's
case!).  What I was thnking of was this one:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-klensin-idna-alternatives-00

A
-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at commandprompt.com
+1 503 667 4564 x104
http://www.commandprompt.com/