is IDNA the ML-DNS we wait for ?

Andrew Sullivan ajs at
Sat May 17 15:10:26 CEST 2008

On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 10:50:12PM -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> > 6- why was the IDNA option chosen as the best way to support ML-DNS vs. 
> > other possibilities?
> I think this is part of what John's current draft is about.

Apologies, I should have been more precise (especially in John's
case!).  What I was thnking of was this one:

Andrew Sullivan
ajs at
+1 503 667 4564 x104

More information about the Idna-update mailing list