Charter, changes in prefixes, and documentation
vint at google.com
Wed Mar 26 12:11:21 CET 2008
I am by no means trying to despise anything - I just think that the
raise can be more effectlvely exposed in a review of the design team
rather than the charter of the WG.
On Mar 26, 2008, at 6:59 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 12:47:23AM -0700,
> Vint Cerf <vint at google.com> wrote
> a message of 65 lines which said:
>> Too much effort in charter seems like putting effort in the less
>> productive area. [...] I am eager to move ahead with the substantive
> Despising the work on *requirments* will not help the future WG moving
> forward. The work of the small team before there is a WG is
> questionable because there are many wrong assumptions (for instance
> that we should follow ICANN's fear of the so-called "confusable
> characters"). Trying to put this discussion under the carpet is the
> wrong way to go.
> "Where do we go? America or Asia? For a short trip in a big hotel or
> camping in the countryside?"
> "I does not matter, let's move, we'll see later, the important thing
> is to move, no matter the direction."
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
More information about the Idna-update