Reserved general punctuation
patrik at frobbit.se
Thu Mar 20 22:21:00 CET 2008
On 20 mar 2008, at 18.30, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> At 10:20 AM -0700 3/20/08, Mark Davis wrote:
>> No, I'm saying the reverse. The way the 05 logic is set up, the
>> table contains the lines I quoted:
>> 2064..2069 ; DISALLOWED # <reserved>..<reserved>
>> I think it should not; that is, that those *should* be:
>> 2064..2069 ; UNASSIGNED # <reserved>..<reserved>
> Got it. Yes, that seems right.
I just want people to know I have seen this.
More information about the Idna-update