Reserved general punctuation
Paul Hoffman
phoffman at imc.org
Thu Mar 20 15:43:14 CET 2008
At 2:10 AM -0700 3/20/08, Mark Davis wrote:
>1. I just did a test of the 05 tables (against Unicode 5.0).
>
>Other than the Cf issue, I found one other thing. There are
><reserved> characters (that is, General_Category=Cn) that show up as
>DISALLOWED when they shouldn't.
>
>2064..2069 ; DISALLOWED # <reserved>..<reserved>
>...
>
>I believe the reason is that they are default_ignoreable. But
>General_Category=Cn should take precedence.
I am not understanding the logic here. Are you saying IDNA200x should
have a hole for later additions of punctuation to the Unicode
Standard? We don't know the properties of those future characters.
More information about the Idna-update
mailing list